Is The Use of Full Body Scanning Really Worth The Potential Health Risk
The use of Automated Imaging Technology or AIT has been adopted within various U.S. airfields. These machines are also known as full-body scanners where passengers pass through before boarding. This new equipment can be in addition to the accustomed pat-down where travelers have "body contact" with the airport security personnel. Several assert that AIT is "better" in comparison with the older pat-down, however privacy advocates reacted and said that it is the other way around.
In Washington, this advocacy group approached the U.S. Court of Appeals judges. They told the court that the use of full-body scanners is an "unreasonable search" as well as in violation of a passenger's civil rights. This machine is currently being used at airports as a first line of defense at security checkpoints.
A passenger's naked figure is exposed as he or she passes through the device. This is the main objection of the group. They imply that while passengers are spared from body contact, they are subjected to a new insidious technology. EPIC considers the policy "in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution". Aside from the abovementioned, it also violates "laws protecting privacy and religious freedom".
In defense on the use of this modern equipment, the government responded that measures are in place to safeguard the privacy of people. They clarified that a passengers' identity is never made accessible to the "viewers" who are mostly agents at airports. This, the administration says, makes the search reasonable and "minimally invasive". However, the truth to this matter is not yet clear.
EPIC has also informed the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to put on hold the use of such technology. TSA answered that, at present, almost 98 percent of travelers endure full-body scanning with no difficulty. Only about 2 percent of people would opt out in favor of a pat-down. Attorney Marc Rotenberg of EPIC said it may well be likely that passengers do not know that they still have the pat-down as their alternative.
Even the judges themselves also expressed concern on the way TSA has been given the authority to employ the technology. One is the impact of the body scanner on individual passengers. What if one day it would be too late to find out its negative effects on passengers? Why was there no public consultation for inputs before it went into initial use? Would its use be compulsory at all times even if the level of security threat does not warrant?
There are a large number of risks when you travel. In addition to full body scanners, you also have to be safe when you use a public hot spot to connect to the Internet. Just like with body scanners, you have a choice. You can use an Anonymous Proxy to protect your online identity.
Recent Comments